I find the title not very accurate and very misleading. Also the explanation of quantum mechanics effects, the discovery and the future perspectives of it are very confusing for an external reader. As a positive remark, all the claims are supported by links to the references or previous articles and those ones support the conclusions described here

The article reports on a Nature paper, it is easy to follow and fairly accurate. All in all, a very nice work.

Unfortunately, the intro seems a little unclear. It haphazardly throws together all the famous quantum paradoxes. The mention of Schrödinger's cat is especially out of place, as a thought experiment (never performed) that deals with quantum behaviour of macroscopic objects. I find it misleading to just name-check it and then proceed to discuss a real experiment with macroscopic quantum behaviour.

A bit clickbaity title, but the content references scientific discovery and seems sound and ubiased.