Score Display

How scientists score media content

1. Evidence

To what extent does the science support the conclusions described in the article?

2. Balance

Does the article provide an unbiased view of the scientific content and interpretation?

3. Clarity

Does the explanation of the science facilitate sufficient understanding and avoid confusion?

4. Total Score

The total score is the average across all of the article's reviews.

5. Score Variation

The flanking dotted lines represent the variation (standard deviation) in scoring across all article reviews. Shown if an article has been reviewed by multiple scientists.

Further guidance for reviewers is available here

Scoring breakdown:

0–3: Low

Evidence: The article presents minimal or no valid supporting scientific evidence. Claims may be based on anecdotal information or lack credible sources.

Balance: The content is severely biased, possibly presenting a one-sided view or omitting significant perspectives. There may be indications of political, ideological, or commercial biases.

Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is very poor, leading to confusion or misunderstanding. The article may misuse technical terms or fail to explain concepts adequately.

4–6: Moderate

Evidence: The article provides some supporting scientific evidence, but it may be limited or not entirely robust. References might include a mix of peer-reviewed studies and less credible sources.

Balance: The content attempts to present multiple perspectives but may still exhibit some bias or lack depth in covering differing viewpoints. There might be excessive exaggerations or omissions.

Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is adequate but may lack depth or precision. Some readers might find certain sections unclear or oversimplified.

7–10: High

Evidence: The article thoroughly supports its claims with high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific studies or reputable sources. The evidence presented is current and relevant.

Balance: The content provides a well-rounded view, presenting different perspectives on the topic without unnecessary exaggeration or sensationalism. It objectively represents the science without apparent biases.

Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is excellent, making complex ideas accessible and understandable to the general audience. Visual aids, if used, enhance comprehension.