Scoring breakdown:
0–3: Low
Evidence: The article presents minimal or no valid supporting scientific evidence. Claims may be based on anecdotal information or lack credible sources.
Balance: The content is severely biased, possibly presenting a one-sided view or omitting significant perspectives. There may be indications of political, ideological, or commercial biases.
Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is very poor, leading to confusion or misunderstanding. The article may misuse technical terms or fail to explain concepts adequately.
4–6: Moderate
Evidence: The article provides some supporting scientific evidence, but it may be limited or not entirely robust. References might include a mix of peer-reviewed studies and less credible sources.
Balance: The content attempts to present multiple perspectives but may still exhibit some bias or lack depth in covering differing viewpoints. There might be excessive exaggerations or omissions.
Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is adequate but may lack depth or precision. Some readers might find certain sections unclear or oversimplified.
7–10: High
Evidence: The article thoroughly supports its claims with high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific studies or reputable sources. The evidence presented is current and relevant.
Balance: The content provides a well-rounded view, presenting different perspectives on the topic without unnecessary exaggeration or sensationalism. It objectively represents the science without apparent biases.
Clarity: The explanation of scientific concepts is excellent, making complex ideas accessible and understandable to the general audience. Visual aids, if used, enhance comprehension.
