Evidence: The definition of the exceptional point is well established, and the article does not contain any apparent exaggeration or factual errors. However, additional references to relevant literature would strengthen the argument and provide a more comprehensive and balanced perspective.

Balance: The article does not focus solely on cases where exceptional points enhance sensing capabilities. It also provides evidence of situations in which exceptional points do not improve sensing performance. Therefore, the argument presented is reasonably balanced.

Clarity: The article is well written and accessible to researchers in the field, as well as to physics enthusiasts with some relevant background. The key concepts are clearly defined before the main arguments are presented.